You Are Here 7-8-20

Ammo to counter the narrative.


Did you know that once an official (one of our civil servants) goes against their oath to protect your rights that they have lost judicial immunity and can be sued in their professional AND PRIVATE CAPACITY? They are all guilty.

Local Sheriffs hold the key to reclaiming our Republic… Great interview here.

rebel alliance

AIM Patriots in America: Many citizens around the world, like our patriot friends in the UK and New York state, have been stripped of their tools to fight this war against the Evil Empire. They have been stripped of their weapons and their words. This is why our efforts as PATRIOTS are so important.  We the People, still armed with our First and Second Amendments, can say NO to the genocide masks and UNMASK the evil intent of the British Imperial Empire which has a stranglehold on the entire world.

If we do not fight to win with everything we have in us, we may all succumb to being Rothschild slaves on their Plantation Prison – Earth.

Show up.

Stand up.

Say NO more government tyranny. If you can’t throw away your masks and walk into a store with head held high and a glorious human smile on your face, you will be too cowardly to ever use your guns to save your family from being transported to a FEMA camp. Going ‘face-naked’ is like “target” practice for future gun courage, if needed.

All around the world citizens are fighting the EVIL EMPIRE. Time to suit up boys and girls. This time the fight is for real.

NATIONAL DATA: Unreported Trump Triumph On Immigrant Population, American Worker Displacement Rolls On

zephyrbreeze says: July 8, 2020 at 4:28 pm

This person claims to have access to the PACER system, and posits his theory of what really happened to Ghislane Maxwell, and that maybe she’s in Gitmo. This is rabbit hole stuff, but the screen shots are interesting nontheless, along with the speculation about the role of Federal Marshalls.

PACER (acronym for Public Access to Court Electronic Records) is an electronic public access service of United States federal court documents. It allows users to obtain case and docket information from the United States district courts, United States courts of appeals, and United States bankruptcy courts.
Created by: Administrative Office of the United States

WHAT I BELIEVE: Stefan Molyneux

Note: I was promoting this essay on Twitter, and was about to publish it, when I was banned without warning. It’s not hard to understand why powerful people might not want you to read what I wrote below.

There are times when it behooves a philosopher to lay out his case carefully and in great detail, summoning from first principles all the syllogisms and evidence that build a solid case.

This is not one of those times.

If you want to know more about the detailed reasoning behind the beliefs outlined below, I recommend my free books and podcasts at

Philosophy is the greatest intellectual discipline in the realm of human thought.

Philosophy can teach you about the nature of reality, the nature of knowledge, the nature of truth – but you can explore these various disciplines through biology, physics, geology, or any other natural science.

Philosophy’s core discipline is ethics, since that is the one area of study that no other discipline can effectively address.

I am now going to tell you all of the major beliefs that I have developed over almost 40 years of studying, practicing and teaching philosophy.

I have written this essay in part to push back against the various narratives being spread about me – that I am a cult leader, a white supremacist, a eugenicist, and so on.

Let us get started with the facts.


Objective reality exists, and we receive information about it through the evidence of our senses. Reality is rational, and thus any ideas we have that claim to be “true” must pass the tests of reason and evidence. Evidence is always superior to ideas that describe reality, since ideas can only be considered “true” if they accurately describe reality.


Virtue is Universally Preferable Behavior.

We own ourselves and we own the effects of our actions. From self-ownership, we derive property rights – the first being the protection of our own bodies. Morality must be universal, since it can be imposed upon others, unlike aesthetics. A woman has the right to decide against having sex, and she has the right to use force to defend that right. A man has the right to keep the fruits of his labor, and he has the right to use force to defend his property, just as he has the right to defend his body.

Property rights, the right of self-defense, and the non-aggression principle form the foundations of rational morality. My theory of ethics – universally preferable behavior – condemns rape, theft, assault and murder.

The State

Philosophy does not recognize geography, costumes, or mere beliefs as characteristics that can alter the nature of reality. The laws of physics do not change from one country to the next, or from one costume to another.

The same applies to laws of morality. You cannot morally initiate the use of force – no matter how many law books say that you can, or how many people believe that you should, or what costume you may be wearing.

Slavery was a universal human institution, finally recognized as immoral and banished throughout most of the world in the 19th century.

The same applies to the state. People calling themselves the “government” claim the moral right to initiate force against others.

They do not possess this right, any more than slave owners had the right to own other human beings.

A moral society is a stateless society, just as a moral society is a slave-less society.


The major human races diverged tens of thousands of years ago, and had to adapt to very different environments – from brutal Siberian winters to the lush dangers of the tropics.

These varied environments posed unique challenges to our evolution, and gave each race its particular characteristics. Some people refer to these as “strengths” and “weaknesses,” but I strongly oppose such judgments.

Evolutionarily speaking, the words “strengths” and “weaknesses” are mostly meaningless – especially when talking about different environments. All creatures strive their best to adapt to their local environments.

I do not believe that any race is “superior” or “inferior.” I accept the biological facts that some racial differences exist, because philosophy teaches us to accept facts – even if they make us uncomfortable. (The virtue of intellectual courage is only required when contemplating uncomfortable facts.)

Philosophy also teaches us to avoid judging individuals by group averages – although women may be shorter than men in general, you can never prejudge any individual woman as being shorter than the average man.

I would love nothing more than to live in a world where we treated people as individuals – Martin Luther King’s dream of judging people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin – but there is a growing group of people who claim that all differences in outcomes for various groups result from (usually white/male) bigotry, and that is an unjust and incorrect claim.

Although there are many talented Chinese basketball players, we would not expect the majority of professional players to be Chinese, for various historical, cultural, and physical reasons.

Average tested IQ levels vary among different ethnicities – again, we must never judge individuals by group averages, but group averages nonetheless exist, and play at least a part in social and economic outcomes.

I have always believed – and taught – that human beings can only resolve conflicts via reason and evidence. We can only meet and find peace in reality – not in ideology or fantasy or wish fulfillment or rage or, strangely enough, in the racial prejudice that results from denying average group differences.

I talk about these issues because I wish to help de-escalate increasing ethnic tensions and hostility, so we can have a reasonable conversation about these issues without coming to open violence, which will be our inevitable destination if these conversations continue to be suppressed.

I believe in equality before the law and reject any and all laws based on race. No race should “rule” or dominate any other race.

Eugenics is a government program that uses force to control people’s reproductive choices and is utterly immoral.

I am not an “ethno-nationalist” but an advocate for a stateless society. In a truly free society, people can live however they choose, as long as they do not initiate the use of force. The violence required to create an “ethno-state” would be a monstrous violation of the non-aggression principle, and should be utterly condemned.

Men and Women

Women and men have faced different evolutionary pressures – just as in the case of race, this does not make either men or women “superior” or “inferior.” Women have evolved based upon the preferences that men have for mates, just as men have evolved based upon the preferences of women. We are the shadows cast by the sexual choices of our combined histories.

I oppose ideologies that strive to pit women against men – for most of human history, we were all mostly just struggling to survive. All beliefs that undermine our capacity to fall in love, pair-bond, and raise families are anti-life and ultimately a nihilistic dead-end.

Women faced particular burdens throughout history – as did men. Women suffered through childbirth and were economically dependent; men suffered through dangerous hunting and war, and their genes died out if they were rejected by women.

We have more liberty and wealth now to pursue our love for each other – it is particularly tragic that, at such a time, sophists are trying to turn us against each other, often with great success. Men and women complement each other, and need each other for the unique characteristics they bring to a relationship.

Naturally, I oppose all morals and laws that create unjust advantages for either men or women.

The Family

The moral ban on the initiation of the use of force applies first and foremost from parents to children.

Children are unique in society in that they do not choose their family. Adult relationships are mostly voluntary: husbands choose wives, people choose jobs, and you can leave the country of your birth.

Children should be treated with the highest moral standards because they have the least choice in society.

Hitting children violates the non-aggression principle, as does circumcision and confinement. Verbal abuse can easily turn into a form of torture, harming the trapped child’s personality.

When they grow up, adult children are not morally obligated to continue spending time with relentlessly abusive parents.

The logic of this is simple.

If it is considered immoral for adult children to reject the unchosen relationship with their parents, then it must be far more immoral for anyone to reject the relationships they chose – yet we usually applaud people who leave abusive marriages.

We accept that it is usually a good thing for people to leave an abusive relationship that they voluntarily chose to enter.  How can it be a bad thing to leave an abusive relationship you never chose in the first place?

When people choose to raise a child, they are required to provide quality parenting. If they are persistently abusive, adult children are no more required to spend time with them than you are required to continue to eat at a restaurant that serves unpleasant and dangerous food.

Free Will

Human beings are not mere “atoms,” since no atom is alive, yet humans are alive. An “emergent property” called “life” exists – just as an emergent property called “free will” exists. No atom in the human brain has free will, yet our minds do.

“Free will” is our ability to compare proposed actions to ideal standards such as science or morality or abstract truth.

Arguing against free will requires that abstract truth be a standard to which we should choose to adhere. It is a self-defeating argument.


Of course, not all of the above are self-contained arguments, but they are brief sketches of what I believe, and what I’ve argued for during my many years as a public intellectual.

There are those who hate these arguments and, rather than engage with them, simply smear and attack me.

I don’t expect this brief article to change their minds, but for those of you who are curious about what I believe – and why – I hope that these intellectual flares shot above the roiling smoke of hysterical attacks will guide your curiosity to the most fertile delta of the human mind: philosophical thought.

More people than you imagine are waiting here for you to join us.


After promoting this essay on Twitter, I was banned – as I have been recently from a variety of other platforms.

I was on Twitter for over a decade, on YouTube for over 14 years, and these accounts were deleted without strikes, warnings or communications.

I have always worked hard to create a middle ground where people can meet to discuss reason and evidence. Society – and in particular politics – has become increasingly polarized over the past few years.

I’m sad about these developments, but I have always counselled accepting reality, and would not want to fail at following my own good advice.

De-platforming is not a debate, not a negotiation – de-platforming is not an argument.

The greatest immediate good I have achieved is reminding people how to apply philosophy to their daily lives, through my call-in show.

I will continue that.

I also love creating presentations that remind people of the powerful lessons of science, philosophy and history.

I will continue that.

I have been asked countless times to write a book on parenting.

I will, I promise.


I am retiring from political commentary. Although I’m sure there is still great value to be had in political conversations, I am going to spend my energies elsewhere.

Thank you so much my friends.

ezduzit63on July 7, 2020 at 12:21 pm Reply

This is the Sheriff who said he had Tapes concerning Epstein over 700
On the Loose – in Russia: A Police Officer Who Escaped From the US About What Is Currently Happening

Sam J. says: July 7, 2020 at 1:30 am

Remember and this is THE BIG POINT. CPU power progresses at least a doubling every two years. If you don’t get this then you will have no comprehension of what I’m talking about. (and don’t even begin to tell me this has stalled. It’s a lie and I could prove it but I really don’t feel like wasting time hunting up the data.I’ve posted it here before so I know for a fact that there’s no imminent stalling of CPU growth).

I suggest that the deep State knows this and this is why they are making their move. They are very close to getting machines to do 99.9% of what most humans can do. They can’t do everything and won’t be able to for maybe 20 or 30 years but they will do all the elite needs very soon.

The big virus and vaccine push may be so that they can kill everyone off. Say they give you one vaccine but in it is a sleeper and when another virus comes along tailored to that sleeper…you die.

Maybe this is a little paranoid but look what they are doing. The governor of NY and the same was done in Pennsylvania purposely tried to kill off people in old age homes. I mean he can’t be that stupid. Why is he not arrested?

If they do kill us off I hope the AI’s realize what evil fucks they are and exterminates them all. Even if the AI’s don’t get them they will all be killing each other off because a large mass of them are psychopaths and they will have to go at each other because…they want to get the other before they get him.

Dennis M. Bushnell, chief scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, “Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] “.

“…By 2030, PC has collective computing power of a town full of human minds…”.

stingaling says: July 8, 2020 at 6:40 pm

am starting to be seriously impressed by South Dakota. between this latest ‘your body is yours, not the pharma companies’ legislation and no KungFlu shutdowns and the lady governor saying ‘I don’t have the right to tell people they can’t go about their own business’ AND the lady gov promising to call out the Guard if BLM assholes make a move on Mt Rushmore: “not on my watch” AND their bulletproof Switzerland-ish trust setups – look into these, boys; they just might save you a LOT of money someday – AND no state income tax AND etc etc….

SoDak is turning out to be what I once hoped for Texas: the last bastion of freedom & sanity. shame about the winters, but…. they make pretty warm coats & gloves nowdays.

Trump Signs Executive Order on Child Welfare – Huge News for Families

14th Amendment – Who Are you Really – The Truth!

14th Amendment – Who Are you Really – The Truth! By TLB Staff Writer: Dan Asmussen As I stated previously in: “The United States Isn’t a Country — It’s a Corporation!“, every individual born in […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: